Download Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres by Douglas C. Ravenel PDF

By Douglas C. Ravenel

Because the book of its first version, this publication has served as one of many few to be had at the classical Adams spectral series, and is the easiest account at the Adams-Novikov spectral series. This new version has been up-to-date in lots of areas, in particular the ultimate bankruptcy, which has been thoroughly rewritten with an eye fixed towards destiny learn within the box. It continues to be the definitive reference at the reliable homotopy teams of spheres. the 1st 3 chapters introduce the homotopy teams of spheres and take the reader from the classical ends up in the sphere even though the computational features of the classical Adams spectral series and its variations, that are the most instruments topologists need to examine the homotopy teams of spheres. these days, the most productive instruments are the Brown-Peterson thought, the Adams-Novikov spectral series, and the chromatic spectral series, a tool for examining the worldwide constitution of the strong homotopy teams of spheres and pertaining to them to the cohomology of the Morava stabilizer teams. those themes are defined intimately in Chapters four to six. The made over bankruptcy 7 is the computational payoff of the booklet, yielding loads of information regarding the solid homotopy staff of spheres. Appendices persist with, giving self-contained debts of the speculation of formal team legislation and the homological algebra linked to Hopf algebras and Hopf algebroids. The booklet is meant for an individual wishing to review computational strong homotopy concept. it truly is obtainable to graduate scholars with an information of algebraic topology and instructed to someone wishing to enterprise into the frontiers of the topic.

Show description

Read or Download Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres PDF

Best symmetry and group books

Derived Equivalences for Group Rings

A self-contained advent is given to J. Rickard's Morita thought for derived module different types and its contemporary functions in illustration idea of finite teams. specifically, Broué's conjecture is mentioned, giving a structural reason behind family members among the p-modular personality desk of a finite workforce and that of its "p-local structure".

Using Groups to Help People

This new version of utilizing teams to aid humans has been written with the pursuits, wishes, and issues of staff therapists and staff staff in brain. it really is designed to assist practitioners to plot and behavior healing teams of numerous forms, and it offers frameworks to help practitioners to appreciate and decide how one can reply to the original occasions which come up in the course of crew periods.

Additional info for Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres

Sample text

11. Morava Vanishing Theorem. 8) E1n,s = 0 for s > n2 . 6) that every sufficiently small open subgroup of Sn has the same cohomology as a free abelian group of rank n2 . 6). 19 appear in the chromatic spectral sequence. , the invariant prime ideal In = (p, v1 , . . , vn−1 )], then L/J is a submodule of N n and M n , so Ext0 (L/J) ⊂ Ext0 (N n ) ⊂ Ext0 (M n ) = E1n,0 . Recall that the Greek letter elements are images of elements in Ext0 (J) under the appropriate composition of connecting homomorphisms.

31) says the map is nontrivial for some n > 0. Now consider the cofiber sequence S −n−1 → RP−n−1 → RP−n . The map from S k to RP−n is trivial by assumption so we get a map from S k to S −1−n , defined modulo some indeterminacy. Hence x ∈ πk+1 (S 0 ) gives us a coset M (x) ⊂ πk+1+n (S 0 ) which does not contain zero. 40 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE HOMOTOPY GROUPS OF SPHERES We call M (x) the Mahowald invariant of x, and note that n, as well as the coset, depends on x. The invariant can be computed in some cases and appears to be very interesting.

5. UNSTABLE HOMOTOPY GROUPS AND THE EHP SPECTRAL SEQUENCE 31 The largest possible r above depends on the largest powers of 2 dividing k + 1. Let k = 2j (2s + 1),   if j ≡ 1 or 2 mod (4) 2j φ(j) = 2j + 1 if j ≡ 0 mod (4)   2j + 2 if j ≡ 3 mod (4) and ρ(k) = φ(j). 16. Theorem (Adams [16]). (a) With notation as above, S k−1 admits ρ(k) − 1 linearly independent tangent vector fields and no more. 15 (c)). 7) dφ(j) (xk−1 ) k−2,k−j is the (nontrivial ) image of α ¯ j in Eφ(j) . We remark that the ρ(k) − 1 vector fields on S k were constructed long ago by Hurwitz and Radon (see Eckmann [1]).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 12 votes